{"id":11489,"date":"2017-05-01T11:03:10","date_gmt":"2017-05-01T05:33:10","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.tarshi.net\/inplainspeak?p=11489"},"modified":"2018-09-19T16:32:01","modified_gmt":"2018-09-19T11:02:01","slug":"review-extra-marital-sex","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.tarshi.net\/inplainspeak\/review-extra-marital-sex\/","title":{"rendered":"Review: Offers You Can\u2019t Refuse"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>It was a million dollar question. Literally. The Hollywood film <em>Indecent Proposal<\/em> (1993) had actors Demi Moore and Woody Harrelson playing, respectively, Diana Murphy, a real estate professional, and David Murphy, an architect, who are childhood sweethearts just within grasp of realising their dream house when recession strikes. They lose their jobs, default on house loans, and stare into a future waiting tables and driving cabs.<\/p>\n<p>In a last-minute attempt to salvage the situation, they hit Vegas. Enjoying a lucky run the first day, they win $25,000. Jubilantly throwing their winnings into the air in the hotel room, they make love under silk sheets as notes fall like flurries of snow.<\/p>\n<p>The next day, they lose it all. Then, a billionaire called John Gage (Robert Redford) enters their life. He asks Diane to cast the die for him in a game of roulette. Diane\u2019s throw wins him a million dollars. He books them a room at the Hilton for the night and invites them to join him in celebrating.<\/p>\n<p>Conversation turns later that evening, and not so innocently, to what money can buy. \u201cYou can\u2019t buy people,\u201d says Diane. Gage takes her up on that, and asks David the big question. \u201cSuppose someone offered you a million dollars for a night with your wife.\u201d \u201cI\u2019d assume you\u2019re kidding,\u201d says David. \u201cSuppose I\u2019m not,\u201d says Gage.<\/p>\n<p>The Murphys beat a hasty retreat but the night is restless. Diane says the unspeakable: she\u2019d do it for David. \u201cAfter all, it wouldn\u2019t mean anything. It\u2019s just my body. It\u2019s not my mind. It\u2019s not my heart.\u201d So after signing a contract to make it all legit, Diane is spirited off for the night in a helicopter by Gage and his staff as David chases after them, having changed his mind. And when she returns, things are different.<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_11490\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-11490\" style=\"width: 500px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img class=\"wp-image-11490\" src=\"https:\/\/www.tarshi.net\/inplainspeak\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/04\/Insert-image-1_Manjima-300x240.jpg\" alt=\"Offers You Can\u2019t Refuse: Films on Extra-Marital Sex for Money\" width=\"500\" height=\"400\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.tarshi.net\/inplainspeak\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/04\/Insert-image-1_Manjima-300x240.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.tarshi.net\/inplainspeak\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/04\/Insert-image-1_Manjima.jpg 600w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 500px) 100vw, 500px\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-11490\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Still from &#8216;Indecent Proposal&#8217; (1993)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\">The premise of <em>Indecent Proposal<\/em> was delicious and provocative, with almost universal appeal. A few years later, another film came along bringing it closer home.<\/p>\n<p>Basu Bhattacharya\u2019s Hindi film <em>Aastha:<\/em> <em>In the Prison of Spring<\/em> (1997) had actor Rekha playing a housewife (Mansi) and Om Puri, a college lecturer (Amar). The middle-class couple\u2019s household runs on a single income and tight budget, so when their school-going daughter\u2019s shoes give in unexpectedly, Mansi is perplexed. She goes to buy new shoes but cannot afford the pair she likes. Reena (Daisy Irani), another customer in the shop, offers to buy it for her.<\/p>\n<p>Reena takes Mansi to her hotel for coffee afterwards. It turns out she is a madam and has surreptitiously invited a wealthy customer, Mr Dutt (Navin Nischol), for Mansi to have sex with in exchange for payment. \u201c<em>Main apne aap ko rok nahi payi,<\/em>\u201d (\u201cI couldn\u2019t stop myself,\u201d) Mansi says later of the encounter.<\/p>\n<p>When Mansi returns home, shocked at what she has done, and enters the shower fully clothed, she stops in a moment of practicality and takes out the money from her blouse to put it in a dry spot before getting back teary-eyed into the shower. While Amar remains absorbed in his philosophical treatise on the nature of love, in his fan-like posse of students, in his exploration of tribal customs in which men trade in women with money, Mansi\u2019s encounters continue.<\/p>\n<p>However, things implode when Reena starts coming to the house because Mansi, overcome with guilt and shame, starts avoiding her. Also, one of Amar\u2019s fan-students overhears Reena and Mansi in a hotel lobby. An awkward resolution of the dilemma takes place as Amar\u2019s student, now Mansi\u2019s ally, lays the truth out before him as a hypothetical dilemma. Should her husband accept the misguided wife back, the student asks? Amar responds, perhaps knowingly, that relationships are not about forgetting or forgiving, but about understanding why people do the things they do.<\/p>\n<p>For many of us careening to adulthood at the time, these films pushed us to confront our own biases. They asked us to stand in Diane and Mansi\u2019s shoes and ask ourselves, what would we have done? Would we spend one night with a man (Robert Redford, no less) for a million dollars? Would we be able to resist the option that opened up to Mansi? And the truth of it was that this was a difficult question to answer.<\/p>\n<p>It was a difficult question to answer because the films nudged us to think differently of sex, sexuality, and money. Both Gage and Dutt were decent and respectful of the women in the process of paid sex. <em>Aastha\u2026<\/em> had pleasure-filled erotic scenes in the process of paid sex, not violence or coercion.<\/p>\n<p>In fact, it is through this sex-outside-marriage that Mansi learns of her sexuality and is in awe of the pleasure the body is capable of giving. \u201c<em>Mujhe nahin malum tha ki apni sharir se itna kuchh kar sakte hain\u2026 mera apna sharir kitna kuchh de sakta hai. Sab kuchh mehekne laga. Saath hi saath payda hua ek paap ka ehsas,<\/em>\u201d (\u201cI didn\u2019t know my own body could give me so much. Everything came alive. Along with this, a feeling of sin also grew,\u201d) she unravels in front of Amar\u2019s student, of the guilt alongside the pleasure she had experienced, and the devastating implications dawning on her.<\/p>\n<p>And there were implications even for Diane. David can\u2019t stop himself from asking her what happened that night. When she says, \u201cIt was just sex,\u201d he asks, \u201cWas it good sex?\u201d When she says, \u201cYes,\u201d it is the last straw for David, and he leaves her.<\/p>\n<p>These films showed us that:<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"wpex-text-highlight\">Sex can be pleasurable when money is involved. Even for women.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span class=\"wpex-text-highlight\">Sex can be pleasurable without love. Even for women.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span class=\"wpex-text-highlight\">Sex can be pleasurable if there is respect.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span class=\"wpex-text-highlight\">Sex can be pleasurable. Period.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>(And not restricted to sexual organs. In <em>Aastha\u2026<\/em>\u2019s sex scenes, the ears, toes, feet, fingers, face \u2013 even Om Puri\u2019s famous nose \u2013 are all erogenous zones.)<\/p>\n<p>Both films also showed us a clear snapshot of the exasperation and labour that is marriage. Diane rants at having to pick up after David all the time. His ambitions drive their life. She follows his dreams. Mansi sweeps, swabs, dusts, irons, and cooks. \u201cMansi, chai,\u201d are the first words the liberal (almost feminist) Amar utters when he enters the house. When Amar asks the vegetable vendor one day to find them a domestic worker (alluding to Mansi\u2019s function in his life as housekeeper), Mansi caustically questions his sudden concern.<\/p>\n<p>We witness in Mansi the humiliating paralysis of housewives with no private disposable income. After she begins to earn, Mansi can secretly buy little things and manage the realities of living in a material world in which her child goes to a private school where everyone wears Nike and Adidas and comes to school in long cars. \u201cOnly the uniform is the same,\u201d she complains to Amar, of the struggle to keep up with the Joneses in their child\u2019s school.<\/p>\n<p>Mansi and Amar\u2019s sex life changes with Mansi earning. She begins to take the initiative sexually, and has a new set of moves (that she attributes to watching a \u2018blue film\u2019). A scene in which she is the woman on top hints at how a sexually empowered woman can transform intimacy in a traditional marriage.<\/p>\n<p>In retrospect, I wonder if films like<em> Indecent Proposal <\/em>and <em>Aastha\u2026 <\/em>would be made today. In this age, you might be considered a fool to say no to a Gage-like offer. Both films were struggling with questions of their time: the rising importance and pressure of accumulating money, and its collision with existing moral frameworks.<\/p>\n<p><em>Aastha<\/em>\u2026, for instance, is set seven years into globalised India, where wearing branded clothing means social mobility, and new desires have been ignited in a socialist nation. Mansi\u2019s first time in Reena\u2019s hotel room (suite, as Reena corrects her) has her doing a double take at the fragrance of the soap, and putting the towel against her face again as if she can\u2019t believe how soft it is. Diane tastes a fancy chocolate and hides a handful in her bag at the hotel shop while her face can\u2019t hide the pleasure from it.<\/p>\n<p>Oh, the seduction of materialism. What do you do about the sensory pleasures that money <em>can<\/em> buy, but how do you resist the commodification that liberal capitalism endorses? Can you succumb to the one without being implicit in the other?<\/p>\n<p>At the end of course, one can\u2019t escape the moral dilemma at the heart of the films \u2013 the right or wrong of sex-for-money, especially for married women, and the conflicts it produces in the marriage. It is striking that in other films like <em>Saaheb<\/em> (1985, Hindi, in which a young footballer secretly sells a kidney to ease the financial burden on his family), an air of nobility is brought to bear on the protagonist, while here, a sense of shame bleaches into the frame. Questionable is the moral framework in which something as potentially dangerous as selling your kidneys is okay, but having consensual sex for money is not.<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p style=\"text-align: right;\"><span style=\"font-size: 12px;\">Cover image from <em>Aastha:<\/em> <em>In the Prison of Spring<\/em> (1997)<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>For many of us careening to adulthood at the time, these films pushed us to confront our own biases. They asked us to stand in Diane and Mansi\u2019s shoes and ask ourselves, what would we have done? Would we spend one night with a man (Robert Redford, no less) for a million dollars? Would we be able to resist the option that opened up to Mansi? And the truth of it was that this was a difficult question to answer.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":172,"featured_media":11491,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1,1208,12,3],"tags":[1227,159,1218,1226,1220,34],"class_list":{"0":"post-11489","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-categories","8":"category-money-and-sexuality","9":"category-the-sessions","10":"category-review","11":"tag-aastha-in-the-prison-of-spring","12":"tag-film-review","13":"tag-indecent-proposal","14":"tag-manjima-bhattacharjya","15":"tag-money-and-sexuality","16":"tag-sex-work"},"menu_order":959,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.tarshi.net\/inplainspeak\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11489","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.tarshi.net\/inplainspeak\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.tarshi.net\/inplainspeak\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.tarshi.net\/inplainspeak\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/172"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.tarshi.net\/inplainspeak\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11489"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/www.tarshi.net\/inplainspeak\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11489\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":11535,"href":"https:\/\/www.tarshi.net\/inplainspeak\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11489\/revisions\/11535"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.tarshi.net\/inplainspeak\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/11491"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.tarshi.net\/inplainspeak\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11489"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.tarshi.net\/inplainspeak\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11489"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.tarshi.net\/inplainspeak\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11489"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}