{"id":11103,"date":"2017-03-15T21:00:57","date_gmt":"2017-03-15T15:30:57","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.tarshi.net\/inplainspeak?p=11103"},"modified":"2019-04-04T22:21:41","modified_gmt":"2019-04-04T16:51:41","slug":"blog-roll-rootless-nepal-marriage","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.tarshi.net\/inplainspeak\/blog-roll-rootless-nepal-marriage\/","title":{"rendered":"Rootless"},"content":{"rendered":"<header>\n<p class=\" persist-header headingclass\">By birth a woman belongs to her father\u2019s clan, and then she gets given to her husband\u2019s. We forget who our mothers and grandmothers are. Their blood does not flow in our lineage<\/p>\n<div class=\"author-time-container\">\n<address>&#8211; Pooja Pant<\/address>\n<\/div>\n<\/header>\n<p>When Africans were enslaved by European colonists and taken to the new continent\u2014now known as the Americas\u2014their names were erased and they were given the names of their \u2018masters\u2019. The names were, in fact, changed every time a new slave owner bought them\u2014take away their names and you take away their identity; take away their identity and you take away their history. We all know that a people without history are a people without roots. And a people without roots can then be moulded into whatever you want them to be. You, then, control their presents and their futures.<\/p>\n<p>Slavery has been abolished in most countries today, but the erasure of identity and roots continues to take place in another form: through the institution of marriage. Marriage is the foundation of most people\u2019s lives in Nepal but when two people are bound in this \u2018holy matrimony\u2019, they enter into an unequal and discriminatory relationship.<\/p>\n<div class=\"amp-hidden\">\n<p>In Nepal, the foundation of a family, and that of the society, is built on pillars of discrimination. Here, the root of the problem stems from the notion that a daughter does not belong to her parents. She is to be raised, nurtured and taught all the skills that make her a perfect object to be given away when the right time comes. She is given a new name, and her identity scrubbed off, so further generations cannot remember where she came from.<\/p>\n<p>As most Nepalis, when I got married, I was expected to move into my husband\u2019s parents\u2019 home. As a woman, my role now was to take care of my husband\u2019s parents and to keep his household running.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p>I was no longer of my family\u2019s clan\u2014a woman joins her husband\u2019s clan and needs to forgo her own. The man\u2019s family is hers now. She has to learn to let go what her mother has taught her, and learn what her mother-in-law will teach her. And if she is a \u2018good\u2019 wife\u2014one who is subservient and follows prescribed norms\u2014one day she will be given the prize of becoming a mother-in-law with her own son\u2019s wives to train.<\/p>\n<p>The foundation for inequality in Nepal is in fact laid in the basic concept of marriage. My husband doesn\u2019t need to change his home. I do. A man doesn\u2019t need to bow down to a woman\u2019s parent. She does. A man doesn\u2019t need to cook for her family, sweep her parent\u2019s home, wash clothes, or do the dishes. In Nepal, marriage is not about two people getting together so they can start a new life.<\/p>\n<p>It is about the man bringing free labour to his house. This idea of marriage is so normalised in our society that it is rare to find someone that questions it\u2014no one even pauses to think that maybe there is something inherently wrong with it.<\/p>\n<p>This is taken as casually as we take breathing, something we do instinctively and thoughtlessly. Of course a woman is supposed to move into her husband\u2019s family and learn all the norms, the rules and regulations.<\/p>\n<p>That\u2019s just how it is.<\/p>\n<p>After marriage, a woman is expected to change her last name, which is not much different than changing names to show whose property you are. Then there are the physical signifiers of this ownership. I cannot tell you how many times after I got married that I have been asked by random people: \u201cTika\/ Chura khai ta?\u201d No one asks my husband where the symbols of his marriage are.<\/p>\n<p>My husband is not required to wear any red tika or sindur or glass bangles that signify his marital status. These little symbols imposed on women, on the other hand, are daily reminders that our identities are defined by the men in our lives. By birth a woman belongs to her father\u2019s clan, and then she gets given to her husband\u2019s. We forget who our mothers and grandmothers are. Their blood does not flow in our lineage. Our identities are bound to the men in our lives, but theirs are not bound to ours.<\/p>\n<p>The institution of marriage is solid and unwavering in its treatment of women. My mother was a teenager when she got married to my father. Not yet in high school, she wasn\u2019t consulted or asked for her opinion on the matter. She was still in her teens when she gave birth to me. She was one of the \u2018lucky\u2019 ones who got married to a \u2018decent home that allowed her\u2019 to continue her education. She ended up getting her Master\u2019s degree and as a youth I remember copying my mother\u2019s notes from her college, as a kind of handwriting practice.<\/p>\n<p>I grew up at a time in Nepal where traditional values often clashed with modern ones. Not a typical girl child, I would be on one of the ends of these clashes. I remember an anger seething inside me for most of my life. I hated what I saw around me.<\/p>\n<p>And while I was coming to terms with my own ideas of womanhood, I could see that patriarchy worked in a way that had managed to turn women against women. In my fight for women\u2019s rights I found myself at odds with more women than I would have liked. Women around me often not only gave in to the patriarchal norms but actively enforced it.<\/p>\n<p>The experience of marrying in Nepal would teach me a valuable socio-political lesson that no book ever taught me.<\/p>\n<p>To be uprooted, your identity wiped out, every freedom taken away from you, you are made to submit. It is a fascistic value system that we collectively have agreed to. But we call it family instead. When the woman moves into the man\u2019s house she is not just moving in; she will now be told what to wear, what to eat, when to leave the house and when to return. She has to submit to her \u2018new family\u2019 and forget the old ways. I often wonder if married women in Nepal suffer from Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD).<\/p>\n<p>So when laws are passed that deny citizenship to children based on their mother\u2019s name and property is deemed the inherent right of men, does it come as a surprise to us? The same people who don\u2019t question this patriarchal status quo and who benefit from repressing the other half of this nation are the ones creating and passing these laws. How can we even logically expect our oppressors to make equal and just laws?<br \/>\nWe went through a ten-year long uprising in Nepal, which in the end brought us some political changes.<\/p>\n<p>We can now boast that the President, the House Speaker and the Chief Justice are all women. We now have a 33 percent quota system in place. But somehow you can\u2019t help feeling that all these are merely window dressings that try to cover up the rot in the system.<\/p>\n<p>During the war, one-third of the rebel army were women\u2014rural women who left their homes and picked up a gun, because they were sick of it all. They fought believing that only through political changes could women finally free themselves from the shackles of slavery. But without cultural and economic changes, political freedoms seldom matter. After the war, women returned back to the same society they left behind, were made to fit in, and follow, the same rules they tried fighting against.<\/p>\n<p>Without a radical socio-cultural move that has the capability to shatter the myth of a \u2018good wife\u2019, and a \u2018good woman\u2019, it will take a long time for things to change in Nepal. And the first step towards radicalising our society is to start by radicalising our own families.<\/p>\n<p>Because as Emma Goldman, a feminist and anarchist, once said, \u201cIf love does not know how to give and take without restrictions, it is not love, but a transaction that never fails to lay stress on a plus and a minus.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>This post was originally published <a href=\"http:\/\/kathmandupost.ekantipur.com\/ampnews\/2017-02-18\/rootless.html\" target=\"_blank\">here<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>By birth a woman belongs to her father\u2019s clan, and then she gets given to her husband\u2019s. We forget who our mothers and grandmothers are. Their blood does not flow in our lineage <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":294,"featured_media":11104,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[85,1,1139],"tags":[388,27,495,135,625,1144,434],"class_list":{"0":"post-11103","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-blog-roll","8":"category-categories","9":"category-marriage-and-sexuality","10":"tag-families","11":"tag-feminist","12":"tag-nepal","13":"tag-patriarchy","14":"tag-slavery","15":"tag-wife","16":"tag-woman"},"menu_order":984,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.tarshi.net\/inplainspeak\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11103","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.tarshi.net\/inplainspeak\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.tarshi.net\/inplainspeak\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.tarshi.net\/inplainspeak\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/294"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.tarshi.net\/inplainspeak\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11103"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.tarshi.net\/inplainspeak\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11103\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":11106,"href":"https:\/\/www.tarshi.net\/inplainspeak\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11103\/revisions\/11106"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.tarshi.net\/inplainspeak\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/11104"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.tarshi.net\/inplainspeak\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11103"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.tarshi.net\/inplainspeak\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11103"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.tarshi.net\/inplainspeak\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11103"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}